Sunday, December 4, 2011

Cycling in the Mile End/Cyclisme dans le Mile End

An interesting discussion began at last month's Comité des Citoyens du Mile End at Bar Waverley about cyclists and their respect, or lack of, for the laws of the road. Reports of traffic signals being ignored and cyclists going against the flow of traffic were just two of the examples cited. Most cyclists would probably acknowledge that they have witnessed this kind of behaviour from their two wheeled comrades, and few could honestly say they've never been the guilty party themselves. So what should be done? 

On the one hand, Ruepublique is passionate about public safety on the streets of the Mile End, so any vehicles disobeying traffic laws are clearly a concern. However, from a practical perspective, bicycles need to continue to be encouraged as a form of transport within the community. They possess crucial advantages over cars:
 they are far less likely to cause accidents which result in injury or worse; they have an extremely low carbon footprint; and they provide physical exercise as part of a healthy lifestyleBicycles are neither cars nor pedestrians, but they are far closer to pedestrians on the scale of human mobility. Recognizing the importance of the bicycle, some local residents at November's meeting suggested cyclists should be viewed differently to cars and that certain traffic rules should differ for cyclists (eg. yielding instead of stopping at stop signs and being able to go against traffic on one-way streets). This is an approach that Ruepublique is very interested in pursuing. Similar schemes already exist, for example, the Netherlands has over 6000 'Woonerven', streets where cyclists and pedestrians have legal priority over cars.


Ruepublique will be organising an event with the Comité des Citoyens du Mile End in early 2012 to discuss this issue further and hear the thoughts of local residents. Please join the conversation by offering your thoughts below. Ruepublique will post further details about the event once we have them, as well as our own response to how cycling can continue to be encouraged, yet respect other road users.

---
Une discussion intéressante a été entamée le mois dernier au sein du Comité des Citoyens du Mile End, lors d'une réunion au Bar Waverly, à propos des cyclistes et de leur respect du code de la route, ou plutôt de leur manque de respect. Des rapports de cyclistes ignorants les signaux de circulation ou encore roulants à contresens ne sont que deux exemples parmi tous ceux ayant été cités. La plupart des cyclistes reconnaîtraient probablement qu'ils ont déjà été témoin de ce type de comportement de la part de leurs camarades à deux roues, mais peu d'entre eux seraient prêt à avouer qu'ils en sont eux-même coupable. Alors quoi faire?


D'un côté, Ruepublique a à coeur la sécurité publique dans les rues du Mile End, donc tout  véhicule désobéissant au code de la route est clairement un souci. Cependant, d'un point de vue pratique, il est important de continuer d'encourager l'utilisation du vélo comme moyen de transport dans la communauté. Il possède des avantages cruciaux par rapport à la voiture : les chances qu'il cause des accidents avec blessures ou pire sont moins grandes; il a une empreinte carbone (ou empreinte écologique) extrêmement faible; et il contribue à un mode de vie sain en procurant de l'activité physique. Les bicyclettes ne sont ni des voitures, ni des piétons, mais ils sont beaucoup plus près des piétons sur l'échelle de la mobilité humaine. Reconnaissants l'importance de la bicyclette, quelques résidents locaux ont suggéré à la réunion de novembre que les cyclistes devraient être vue différemment des voitures et que certains codes de la route devraient donc différer pour eux (ex : céder le passage au lieu d'arrêter aux signaux d'arrêt et être capable d'aller en sens contraire de la circulation dans les rues à sens unique). Ceci est une approche que Ruepublique est très intéressée de poursuivre. Des arrangements similaires existent déjà ailleurs. La Hollande, par exemple, possède plus de 6000 "Woonerven" : des rues où les cyclistes et les piétons ont priorité légale sur les voitures.


Ruepublique organisera un évènement avec le Comité des Citoyens du Mile End au début de 2012 pour discuter de ce sujet et pour entendre plus amplement les idées des résidents locaux. Si vous le désirez, vous pouvez vous joindre à la conversation en offrant vos idées sur ce blogue. Ruepublique affichera plus de détails à propos de l'évènement lorsque nous en aurons, ainsi que notre propre réponse sur comment le cyclisme peut continuer à être encouragé tout en respectant les autres usagés de la route.

8 comments:

  1. Ha oui, j'étais à cette soirée, au bar Waverley et je suis un de ceux qui se plaignent du non respect de la signalisation par les cyclistes, et je n'ai d'ailleurs pas toujours respecté moi- même tous les codes. J'ai des idées qu'il me fera plaisir de partager lors de prochaines rencontres.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This could be an interesting conversation. I am not sure how one would go about implementing such a change in rules, whether it would have to be city-wide for example (and that is assuming people even think its a good idea!).

    I do agree that there is an issue, bikes are considered cars when it comes to discussing how they fail to respect traffic laws, but are often not afforded space on the roads even when the cyclist is riding safely and within the rules. Our traffic laws were designed for cars alone, and only later applied to cyclists as an afterthought. There will be strong opinions either way...

    ..and here is an interesting read for those who are interested in reading more about bikes and cars and cities...

    http://www.salon.com/2011/12/04/are_urban_bicyclists_just_elite_snobs/singleton/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great post - very informative. Keep up the good work

    ReplyDelete
  4. Absolutely bikes need to be encouraged. People who are fearful of getting on a bike and into traffic should be made to feel welcome. Certainly infrastructure and rules should not inconvenience cyclists needlessly with impractical detours or unwarranted tickets. However, it seems clear that a balance must be struck between reasonable behaviour and a sense of impunity that some cyclists display with dangerous or disrespectful behaviour...

    ReplyDelete
  5. I also just read this article, which seems to have some parallels to this post, its a good read.

    http://www.salon.com/2011/12/04/are_urban_bicyclists_just_elite_snobs/singleton/

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nice link 514steve. I think the fifth and sixth paragraphs are the most insightful of the article.

    Concerns about cyclists' behaviour being a risk to public safety are perfectly understandable and need to be treated seriously. However, it's difficult not to respond in a condescending manner to those whose complaints about cyclists amount to nothing more than 'I find them annoying'.

    I really liked your first comment btw: 'bikes are considered cars when it comes to discussing how they fail to respect traffic laws, but are often not afforded space on the roads even when the cyclist is riding safely and within the rules'. Very true.

    ReplyDelete
  7. In order to pass any of the pro-cyclist laws you laid out, i think that the whole bit about licensing and registering your bike needs to happen first. Also a helmet should be mandatory, like a seatbelt. if you don't wear one, you should get a ticket. Same concept with a light. No car can drive around with a faulty head or tail light, so if cyclists want the same rights as cars, the same rules should apply.

    I think a lot of cyclists feel unsafe on their bikes because drivers don't take them seriously enough. Maybe the reason for that is that is because many cyclists appear hazardous to drivers on the road. If it was mandatory for cyclists to follow the same sort of safety procedures that drivers do, i think that might change in a hurry.

    hope these comments help,
    Noah

    ReplyDelete
  8. Very interesting comments Noah.

    In particular, I'm always shocked at how many people I see cycling on very busy roads without helmets, it's crazy!

    It seems a real sense of the give and take nature of this debate is beginning to evolve. As cycling matures as a form of transportation should this mean a trade-off between more responsibilities for cyclists and greater recognition/compassion towards them in the transport ecology of cities?

    ReplyDelete